re: Why the liberal interpretation of the Constitution makes no sense...

quote:

---

I didn't read your other fricking post, you micro-cepahlic. Your quote as it stands alone is a misrepresentation on which side Scalia stood upon, arse hat.

---

Haha it's in the SAME POST dipshit. The one to which you originally responded.

And it's not a misrepresentation, it's a quote from Scalia about why he doesn't like strict constructionism. You can be an originalist or textualist and NOT be a strict constructionist.

I'm hope I'm as arrogant despite being blatantly incorrect when I get old as frick, Zach.