Started By
Message

re: Why the liberal interpretation of the Constitution makes no sense...

Posted on 2/10/17 at 9:53 am to
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35240 posts
Posted on 2/10/17 at 9:53 am to
quote:

I hate that argument. The Constitution was written based on principles where application could be derived.
And I'm arguing to maintain those principles, but clearly a completely rigid interpretation is not always reasonable (e.g., can't threaten to murder someone; can't have your own nuclear weapon).

In other words, my perspective is that it's NOT a living, breathing document; however, society is so the interpretations have to take things into consideration.
This post was edited on 2/10/17 at 9:57 am
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41723 posts
Posted on 2/10/17 at 10:03 am to
I'm glad you don't think it's a living document. Too many people believe that.

I agree that there have to be interpretations of our rights based on applications. No right is unlimited. However, too many people want to "interpret" a right away (practically speaking) rather than change the Constitution. It's why we don't need activist judges on the court.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram