- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Any lawyers? What would stop Trump for writing another EO which
Posted on 2/9/17 at 9:20 pm
Posted on 2/9/17 at 9:20 pm
Would be slightly different and rolled out differently, thus not being unconstitutional? Is that even possible? Just wondering why Trump doesn't just write another one that IS constitutional.
Disclaimer: I don't truly understand the legality in all of this, thus the questions.
Disclaimer: I don't truly understand the legality in all of this, thus the questions.
6
Posted on 2/9/17 at 9:24 pm to Cali 4 LSU
Several threads on this. Some center on Trump's political interest in not doing so. Which is valid, whether you agree with making political "wins" a priority or not.
But curtailing the EO to avoid a TRO is probably more difficult than some are letting on. I don't think it's impossible, but Trump's statements as a candidate are a pretty big hurdle when you consider what the reasoning is going to be in the districts where this will be challenged.
But curtailing the EO to avoid a TRO is probably more difficult than some are letting on. I don't think it's impossible, but Trump's statements as a candidate are a pretty big hurdle when you consider what the reasoning is going to be in the districts where this will be challenged.
Posted on 2/9/17 at 9:26 pm to Cali 4 LSU
I think it would be wise to let the current order go the distance in federal adjudication before tipping one's hand on future plans.
Posted on 2/9/17 at 9:27 pm to Cali 4 LSU
To make it legal he would have to acknowledge Saudi Arabia is a threat and attacked the U.S.
But he won't include them.
But he won't include them.
Posted on 2/9/17 at 9:41 pm to Cali 4 LSU
His original EO isn't unconstitutional
Posted on 2/9/17 at 9:41 pm to Cali 4 LSU
quote:
Just wondering why Trump doesn't just write another one that IS constitutional.
Because he's a based alpha non-cuck.
Quit asking questions.
Posted on 2/9/17 at 9:46 pm to Cali 4 LSU
I think the real problem was that it wasn't explained clearly. The seven countries involved are close to being lawless. They don't comply with international standards for passport/Visa applications. The purpose of the EO is to force them to be properly vetted.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News