Started By
Message

re: Why Trump’s executive order on sanctuary cities is unconstitutional

Posted on 1/26/17 at 1:48 pm to
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 1/26/17 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

You cannot commit tax fraud, but as an uninvolved third party you have no duty to stop it. Make sense now?


Not really. Your analogy is weak.
The states and cities are very much involved and don't meet your "uninvolved party" claim. They are not only involved, they are actively encouraging the crime.
Posted by Five0
Member since Dec 2009
11354 posts
Posted on 1/26/17 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

they are actively encouraging the crime.


You don't say?

"Accomplice liability allows the court to find a person criminally liable for acts committed by a different person. If a person aids, assists, or encourages another in the commission of a crime, they are said to be an “accomplice” to the crime. The person who actually commits the act is called the “principal.”

So I'm wrong how?
This post was edited on 1/26/17 at 2:01 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram