- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump mandates all EPA data to be reviewed prior to release
Posted on 1/26/17 at 10:24 am to Y.A. Tittle
Posted on 1/26/17 at 10:24 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Tell me how that works, if I'm a scientist who has externally reviewed something from the EPA that appears would show something really bad and I find out that the EPA has been "ordered" not to release it or release it in some sort of altered form? What happens to me if I decide to go public with it?
You'd be a whistleblower. How'd that work out for Snowden? They aren't exactly treated well.
This post was edited on 1/26/17 at 10:24 am
1
Posted on 1/26/17 at 10:27 am to bmy
quote:
You'd be a whistleblower. How'd that work out for Snowden? They aren't exactly treated well.
So you think EPA data is now being placed on the same level as state intelligence secrets? Are the independent scientist peer reviewers now going to be required to undergo top secret clearance to do so? And you're extrapolating all this from this one line press release (or whatever it is - it's not even exactly clear)?
The level of paranoia here is something.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News