- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NYT shits all over Buzzfeed & Pissgate media
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:10 am to Navytiger74
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:10 am to Navytiger74
quote:
Tapper and the gang on CNN just said the reporting of the unverified details was irresponsible. I agree. Reporting that Trump was briefed about a report that the Russians have compromising information on him is absolutely inbounds, however.
So, just cracking the lid on Pandora's Box (actually, Jar) is okay, but throwing off the cover is not (even though lifting the lid would undoubtedly lead to the cover being tossed aside)?
That's like I hear secondhand hearsay, completely unsubstantiated and unverifiable, about you that you take bribes from Chinese spies in exchange for military secrets. I just report that there's information out there that could affect your security clearance, but say nothing about the "details." There's no legitimate argument I can make that would support the notion that my "report" would not lead to the underlying allegations seeing the light of day.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:19 am to udtiger
quote:Reporting that Teump was briefed on a given topic by the IC isn't second-hand heresay. And if, in the by and by, you heard something like that about me, I'd hope you'd contact the FBI so that it could be investigated and adjudicated. We have too many holes in our intelligence services as it is.
So, just cracking the lid on Pandora's Box (actually, Jar) is okay, but throwing off the cover is not (even though lifting the lid would undoubtedly lead to the cover being tossed aside)?
That's like I hear secondhand hearsay, completely unsubstantiated and unverifiable, about you that you take bribes from Chinese spies in exchange for military secrets. I just report that there's information out there that could affect your security clearance, but say nothing about the "details." There's no legitimate argument I can make that would support the notion that my "report" would not lead to the underlying allegations seeing the light of day.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News