re: Obama Admits Hacking Nothing New

I absolutely am concerned about how they were obtained. However, I refuse to refer to it as "hacking" because it gives a false picture of what occurred (unless they did surreptitiously hack into his computer - something I have not seen). It is my understanding it was a phishing attempt that Mr Podesta fell for. I do notice that 90% (or more) of the dialogue is about hacking and little to nothing is about the content. That, to me, is dishonest.

ETA: This is along the lines of the "Pentagon Papers" in my opinion.