- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Self-driving cars: ethics and economic concerns
Posted on 12/28/16 at 4:29 pm to TigerinATL
Posted on 12/28/16 at 4:29 pm to TigerinATL
quote:I don't know that it's a complaint more than it is a casual fact: the cars will have to be programmed with some "ethics" which might run counter to the preservation of the life of the owner. What if you could buy a "parent bot" that was tasked nominally with taking care of your children and it had to run into a burning daycare center. It can prioritize rescuing YOUR child or it can prioritize rescuing the most children possible. Would you really buy a parent bot with the setting of the pure moral utility of possibly letting your child burn?
I don't get this complaint against autonomous vehicles.
Posted on 12/28/16 at 4:51 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
What if you could buy a "parent bot" that was tasked nominally with taking care of your children and it had to run into a burning daycare center. It can prioritize rescuing YOUR child or it can prioritize rescuing the most children possible. Would you really buy a parent bot with the setting of the pure moral utility of possibly letting your child burn?
That is different than the car example though. For the cars choose the lowest impact like most humans would if they were even capable of doing those calculations, problem solved. For the Nannybot, I think "joining the pack" of the family that buys it and therefor prioritizing it's own family members will be a natural way to program it.
The moral dilemma comes not for the personal Nannybot but the Daycarebot. Babies are dead weight, you can probably save more children by herding the walkers and crawlers out first. That wouldn't be the human reaction, most people would save the helpless babies, but saving more kids would be the utilitarian thing to do. And that's where the questions get interesting, is the choice they would make stripped of human emotion and instinct a better choice?
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News