Started By
Message

re: DATBL offseason thread: proposed rule change inside

Posted on 12/27/16 at 12:57 pm to
Posted by TthomasJR
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2006
17277 posts
Posted on 12/27/16 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

I'd rather make more relievers valuable or just scrap relievers all together. If you want to keep RP, replace SV with IP (for example), then you value RP who pitch better over more innings rather than guys who pitch in certain circumstances. Unless y'all are fans of busting your arse on waivers for Kevin Quackenbush and Tony Cingrani.


I personally am not thrilled about getting rid of Saves.
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27432 posts
Posted on 12/27/16 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

I personally am not thrilled about getting rid of Saves.


You own Edwin Diaz, too?
Posted by fratmonster
Member since Oct 2005
10942 posts
Posted on 12/27/16 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

I personally am not thrilled about getting rid of Saves.



Posted by BackbayDD
Member since Jun 2016
138 posts
Posted on 12/27/16 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

I personally am not thrilled about getting rid of Saves.



On that note, anyone trying to move a closer?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram