- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Michigan court rules okay for police to kill your dog
Posted on 12/25/16 at 7:31 pm to skrayper
Posted on 12/25/16 at 7:31 pm to skrayper
Title is misleading. A Michigan Federal Court made the initial ruling. On appeal, the lower court's ruling was affirmed by the 6th Circuit.
The OP linked article also misleads by drawing conclusions not supported by the facts.
It absolutely, with 100% certainty DID NOT rule that it is ok for police to kill your dog if your dog does anything other than sit silently. Such a conclusion is hardcore stupid to the bone.
It's better to read the facts than just make up stupid shite. Is it really that hard for some of you to understand the actual words of a court ruling written in plain English?
The OP linked article also misleads by drawing conclusions not supported by the facts.
It absolutely, with 100% certainty DID NOT rule that it is ok for police to kill your dog if your dog does anything other than sit silently. Such a conclusion is hardcore stupid to the bone.
It's better to read the facts than just make up stupid shite. Is it really that hard for some of you to understand the actual words of a court ruling written in plain English?
1
Posted on 12/25/16 at 7:52 pm to Willie Stroker
Spot on analysis. At least the article included a link to the actual decision. It is 25 pages and explains every aspect of the case.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News