Started By
Message
locked post

Who here actually believes Russia helped Trump?

Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:06 am
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167510 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:06 am
How far or limited is your belief?

Do you think they had anything to do with Podesta and DNC leaks?

Nothing at all?

What?
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79325 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:11 am to
Russia involved in hacking - Maybe.

Russia involved in WL releases - On some level. I do not think WL is a knowing tool of Russia. I do think Russia and WL are in bed together to some extent. Assange's relationships probably establish that to some degree.

Russia tried to influence election - For sure. Putin underlings went public on Trump being preferable.

Russia actually did influence election - Maybe, but probably not in any decisive manner.

Russia engaged in multi faceted operation to influence US politics, and create dissent and divide in America by exposing MSM and DNC coordination - Yes. I think this was Russia's primary motivation this cycle. And it was at least partially successful.

Russia "hacked" the election or whatever over the top rhetoric media is running with - No.
Posted by Eric Nies Grind Time
Atlanta GA - ITP
Member since Sep 2012
24937 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:12 am to
All I know is Trump publicly asked Russia for hacking help. le guillotine time for Comrade Trump
This post was edited on 12/12/16 at 10:23 am
Posted by i drink the kool aid
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2013
169 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:14 am to
I think Russia probably did try and hack into DNC emails along with HRC's and her high level staffers. I don't think Russia did this to undermine the elections though, I think they did this because Putin thought she was going to win. He was hoping to have dirt on the incoming president. I also don't think Russia had anything to do with the outcome of the elections. I think the America people who voted were the only factors.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51811 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:17 am to
I didn't think it was the Russians that hacked the DNC and we know they didn't on Podesta.

I absolutely think the would rather Trump won because no one with a working brain wanted WW3.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:18 am to
I can't say that I believe it because I don't know how they would actually do it.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:19 am to
Sure

Monafort says hi.

Posted by Numberwang
Bike City, USA
Member since Feb 2012
13163 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:20 am to
I don't believe Russia was involved.

IF they were involved on some level, can you blame them for wanting to stop WWIII with Hillary?

She's a warhawk. Same with McCain & Graham. They are insane people who'd drag us into a nuclear conflict with Russia over "NATO Ally Turkey". They critique Russia's "human rights record" while literally supporting an emerging Islamic dictatorship in Turkey.

They're fricking crazies.
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
26720 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:20 am to
Has it even been proven that the election was "rigged"..?

I just think the Dems were so confident their queen would be elected, they're still in shock. Desperate times calls for desperate measures...
This post was edited on 12/12/16 at 10:26 am
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Do you think they had anything to do with Podesta and DNC leaks?


The narrative in the moment was that it was NSA guys were pissed at Clinton for her gross breaches of national security.

Geez, yesterday on Meet the Press they were asking about the Exxon guy -- how could he possibly be qualified for SoS?

And I wished Prebus would have said -- "He has got to be better than that cunt Clinton."
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:21 am to
What does help mean?

Were those tied to russia involved (some) of the hacks? Yes
Were those tied to russia involved in promoting hacked materials? Yes
Was their aim to disrupt the election? Yes
Did they prefer trumnp to hillary? yes
Did those tied to russia circulate "fake" news? Yes

But did they say, hey, how can we get trump elected? I don't think they did. They were far more successful than they could have hoped though.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54231 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:21 am to
All Russia did was expose the corruptness in our political system - something the media would have done 40 years ago.
Posted by More&Les
Member since Nov 2012
14684 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:22 am to
Unless there is some evidence that Russia forged the DNC and Podesta emails (there isn't) then it doesn't matter who hacked/leaked them.

Trump supporters for the most part were not impacted by these revelations either way. To the extent that it depressed Dem turnout, it may have been impacting somewhat, but people weren't angry because OF the hack/leak they were angry because of the content.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119031 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:23 am to
I take anyone or any media seriously without proof. There is no proof to the Russian hacking claims. None.
Posted by KingSlayer
Member since May 2015
2854 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:26 am to
If exposing the true thoughts and beliefs of the DNC and Clinton campaign through their emails influenced people, regardless of how the emails were exposed, the fault lies with the people in the DNC and Clinton campaign who wrote the emails. Essentially their claim is, "It's the Russian's fault people found out how corrupt we are and how we conspire with the MSM to push our agenda."
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105449 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:26 am to
I think it is unlikely and a lot of political horse play is taking place. I think the Dems have so much corruption that can be unveiled under a new administration they are scared shitless.

I think as a whole the establishment that includes both parties are afraid Trump is going to wreck their status quo.
Posted by Contra
Member since Oct 2016
7524 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:33 am to
Even if they did, it still does not change the fact what was in those emails.

It exposed just how corrupt the msm is. They were/are trying to turn the country into a one party state through propaganda. If it takes Russia or whomever it may be exposing what was actually going on, I'm all for it.

Sometimes things are so corrupt that it does take an outside source exposing it because the msm sure as hell isn't since they're complicit. These people are disgusting human beings.
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
11037 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:36 am to
1. There is so much so-called hacking occurring across the entire world which reaches even into the CPU used to record this response and carried out by such divergent entities as individuals, commercial entities, government entities (including the US), and academic entities as to make Alger Hiss seem like third string on the JV team.

2. All the claptrap regarding how Russia fixed the election is massive fake news on a scale that would have made the old USSR-version of Pravada proud.
Posted by stelly1025
Lafayette
Member since May 2012
8539 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:47 am to
Let's say they were behind the DNC and Podesta hack at this point what difference does it make? Whether is was Russia, China, or some guys that said hey lets go hack some politicians what difference does it make now?

Nothing changes the fact that they were stupid with security and the actual content of the emails from the evil one herself, to her weird campaign manager, and the DNC itself were shady and disturbing.
This post was edited on 12/12/16 at 10:49 am
Posted by ljhog
Lake Jackson, Tx.
Member since Apr 2009
19089 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:49 am to
I don't know why Russia would prefer Trump over Hillary. She single-handily blocked the Keystone pipeline which benefitted Russia and OPEC. An energy independent U.S. would severely reduce oil revenues to the above mentioned parties.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram