Started By
Message

re: Trump: We're not bound to 'one China' policy

Posted on 12/11/16 at 3:14 pm to
Posted by pecxs
Pasadena, CA
Member since Dec 2003
517 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 3:14 pm to
When was last time Uncle Sam made trade deal with China basing on friendship?
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109121 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 3:22 pm to
I mean, we kind of are due to Nixon, but he's free to change it if he wishes.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109121 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

By placating China, we have created a monster. They're on the cusp of superpower status thanks to our trade deals, but they are no friend of the USA.


I disagree. Our current relationship with China I feel has created world stability to where almost all of us are truly united. I can instantly communicate from someone in Xinjiang all thanks to our cooperation. Hope that continues.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80399 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 3:32 pm to
So Clinton was going to agitate Russia and Trump is going to agitate China. Guess we had to choose one or the other one day.
Posted by UAFanFromNOLA
NOLA
Member since Dec 2011
4882 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:00 pm to
I mean, that's basically telling PRC either their government is illegitimate or they have illegitimate claims over Taiwan. There is a reason they are so touchy over this issue. Hell, last time The president of ROC spoke at the US (his alma mater Cornell), PRC started testing middles 60 kilometers off the coast of Taiwan.
Posted by 4Ghost
Member since Sep 2016
8521 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:12 pm to
Go full Ralph Wiggum




HIlarious. Better watch it, or gonna go full ralph on you!

Posted by JaxDog
Member since Jul 2016
472 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

I'll have to ask my friends in Taiwan how they feel about being a bargaining chip.


Who gives a shite
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

This is going to be fun.


Bigly fun.


I bet some big Reds are splitting gaskets right now.


revalue the Yuan, say by 3X.
2X? that is a good start.



Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109121 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

So Clinton was going to agitate Russia and Trump is going to agitate China. Guess we had to choose one or the other one day.


One of my favorite Norm jokes from Weekend Update:

"American President Bill Clinton and Russian President Boris Yeltsin met to discuss the sensitive topic of NATO expansion. President Yeltsin stood firm saying that he must do what is right for Russia, while President Clinton also stood firm saying that he must do what is right for China."
This post was edited on 12/11/16 at 4:29 pm
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

it seems odd that the same people cheerleading our newfound peace with Russia are all for being antagonistic towards China.


Also interesting that Russia is antagonistic to China.

I'd rather work more closely with China than Russia.
Posted by JaxDog
Member since Jul 2016
472 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

I'd rather work more closely with China than Russia.


No
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:33 pm to
China has a stronger economy, more potential for growth, and has the chance with increased wealth to move away from an authoritarian state. Russia has increased its authoritarianism, has become more closely aligned with Iran, and is opposed to the US geopolitically (not to say that China isn't as well). I'd rather work with China.
Posted by TennesseeFan25
Honolulu
Member since May 2016
8391 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:40 pm to
Well we have been working with China and it seems that means corporate espionage, infringing on our American made products, currency manipulation et all.

Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:42 pm to
What makes you think the Russians will play fairly? Hint: they won't.

Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80399 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:42 pm to
But Chinese economic policy is having more of a negative effect on the American economy than Russian economic policy is. I don't mind Trump ratcheting up leverage to get China to level the playing field, but there will be some bumps and bruises along the way while he forces/finds a new equilibrium with the Chinese.

I still think China retaliates by letting North Korea more off the leash. Don't be surprised to see more overt provocation from Lil Kim due to tacit Chinese approval of such as layback for Trump tightening the screws on them. China can't afford a direct confrontation with the US, so they'll use their best proxy.
This post was edited on 12/11/16 at 4:46 pm
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

But Chinese economic policy is having more of an effect on the American economy than Russian economic policy is. I don't mind Trump ratcheting up leverage to get China to level the playing field, but there will be some bumps and bruises while he forces/finds a new equilibrium with the Chinese.



I'm not denying that at all. I don't even think I insinuated that. I understand the point of his statement is an attempt to reframe US-Sino relations in order to gain the upper-hand. I'd still rather work with the Chinese, a country we've worked rather hard to liberalize, and by and large, have succeeded in doing so.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:47 pm to
quote:


I still think China retaliated by letting North Korea more off the leash. Don't be surprised to see more overt provocation from Lil Kil due to tacit Chinese approval of such as layback for Trump tightening the screws on them.




I disagree. I don't think NK will do more than their usual saber-rattling. The key area will be the South China Sea.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80399 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:49 pm to
We've worked well with them when we were the clear hegemonic power and they were simply trying to get their shite in order. However, they've entered a new phase of trying to project power and become a hegemon in their own right, so we will be more directly opposed to them than we have been in the past.

Little brother is growing up and we're about to have to duke it out in the front yard
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
23965 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

I'd rather work more closely with China than Russia.




China has a sustainable, long term economy, Russia does not
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80399 posts
Posted on 12/11/16 at 4:53 pm to
SCS leaves then more open for direct confrontation with the United States. I don't think they want any part of directly firing on uS warships or vice versa.

They'll continue to push expansion in the SCS, but Lil Kim is going to be their punitive response to Trump rocking the globalism boat.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram