Started By
Message

re: Private vs public water in tidal navigable waterways

Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:04 am to
Posted by maisweh
Member since Jan 2014
4076 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Timber shouldn't be managed the same way as tidal marsh. And not everything would be open to duck hunting, most people duck hunt above the saltwater line than below.


all the marsh I know south of the saltwater line is hunted for ducks. venice, the wax, delicroix, leeville, dularge.. all those areas hold big numbers of birds AND fish.
So do we allow hunters now into those waters as wella s fishermen?
Posted by Barf
EBR
Member since Feb 2015
3727 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:05 am to
quote:

So do we allow hunters now into those waters as wella s fishermen?


I don't know dude. I'm not trying to decide who should be allowed where. The only thing I want to know is who pays for coastal restoration. If the answer to that question is the state, then how do you justify keeping them out?
Posted by redfishfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
4425 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 11:12 am to
quote:

So do we allow hunters now into those waters as wella s fishermen?


I really think the only thing the State can do is base what is private and public using a newer more accurate map. I'm not saying 1950 but damn 1812 was a long time ago and no way that map is anywhere close to accurate.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram