Started By
Message

re: North Face is now for poors. Patagonia is trend of moment. Barbour for ballers

Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:40 am to
Posted by Trout Bandit
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2012
13320 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:40 am to
How do you classify Arcteryx mizzou?
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83631 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:43 am to
where does Filson fall into all of this?

Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:50 am to
It's only a matter of time before Arcteryx and Marmot become the new North Face.

Honestly, a great testing ground for winter trends is Big Cedar Lodge in SW Missouri. Big Cedar is a national Top 10 lodge. Real ballers as well as occasional posers from across the country vacation there. My wife and I frequent there especially at Christmas.

I've already seen the shift this year.

There's a few people wearing Patagonia, but they're mostly couples in their 20s or low 30s. Haven't seen ANYONE wearing North Face.

More people are wearing Marmot and Arcteryx gear than Patagonia. And I've seen a few really sharp couples wearing Barbour.

I mean...you can just tell.

Marmot and Arcteryx is about to become overexposed. Patagonia is about to shift from hipster trendy to the brand EVERYONE wants.

But the Barbour people are just quietly counting their cash and lot in life while laughing at the wannabe wealth sporting their "look at me" logo wear.
This post was edited on 12/6/16 at 8:53 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram