Started By
Message

re: The answer is an 8 team playoff set up this way

Posted on 12/5/16 at 1:47 pm to
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85420 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

8 teams:
- The power 5 conference Champs
- The highest ranked non power 5 team
- 2 at larges (wild cards)


This is close to my preference as well. The only thing I would change is the Power/Group of 5 garbage. First, any team in the top 4 is in the playoff. Then, any conference champion in the top 12 fills the remaining spots. If spots still remain, the rest are the highest ranked at-large options.

Since 2007, using the Massey Composite for each year to pick at-large teams, here are your playoffs (Massey Composite ranking in parentheses):

2007
(1) LSU - SEC vs (10) USC - Pac-10
(2) Ohio State - B10 vs (7) Kansas - at-large
(3) Oklahoma - B12 vs (6) WVU - Big East
(4) VT - ACC vs (5) Mizzou - at-large

2008
(1) Oklahoma - B12 vs (9) Boise St. - WAC
(2) UF - SEC vs (8) Utah - MWC
(3) Texas - Top 4 vs (6) Penn St. - B10
(4) USC - Pac-10 vs (5) Texas Tech - at-large

2009
(1) Alabama - SEC vs (9) Ohio St. - B10
(2) Texas - B12 vs (7) Boise St. - WAC
(3) UF - Top 4 vs (6) Oregon - P10
(4) TCU - MWC vs (5) Cincy - Big East

2010
(1) Oregon - P10 vs (9) Wisconsin - B10
(2) Auburn - SEC vs (7) Ohio St. - at-large
(3) TCU - MWC vs (6) Oklahoma - B12
(4) Stanford - Top 4 vs (5) Boise St. - WAC

2011
(1) LSU - SEC vs (8) Wisconsin - B10
(2) Alabama - Top 4 vs (7) Oklahoma - at-large
(3) Oklahoma St. - B12 vs (6) Boise St. - at-large
(4) Stanford - Top 4 vs (5) Oregon - P10

2012
(1) Notre Dame - Top 4 vs (8) Georgia - at-large
(2) Alabama - SEC vs (7) Texas A&M - at-large
(3) Oregon - Top 4 vs (Stanford) - Pac-12
(4) Florida - Top 4 vs (5) Kansas St. - B12

2013
(1) Florida St - ACC vs (8) Missouri - at-large
(2) Alabama - Top 4 vs (7) Michigan St. - B10
(3) Stanford - Pac-12 vs (6) Ohio St. - at-large
(4) Auburn - SEC vs (5) Baylor - B12

2014
(1) Alabama - SEC vs (8) Miss St. - at-large
(2) Oregon - Pac-12 vs (7) Ole Miss - at-large
(3) TCU - Top 4 vs (6) Baylor - B12
(4) Ohio St. - B10 vs (5) Florida St. - ACC

2015
(1) Alabama - SEC vs (8) Iowa - at-large
(2) Clemson - ACC vs (7) Notre Dame - at-large
(3) Oklahoma - B12 vs (6) Stanford - Pac-12
(4) Ohio St. - Top 4 vs (5) Michigan St. - B10

2016
(1) Alabama - SEC vs (10) Western Michigan - MAC
(2) Ohio St. - Top 4 vs (8) Oklahoma - B12
(3) Washington - P12 vs (6) Penn St. - B10
(4) Clemson - ACC vs (5) Michigan - at-large

In 10 years, this method would have left out only one conference champion in lieu of an at-large selection from that conference - in 2011 TCU won the MWC but finished 18th in the rankings, so Boise St. got an at-large bid as the #6 team in the country.

Italicized teams are teams that finished outside the composite top eight but received a bid based on their conference championship. Teams left out with higher rankings than the lowest seed would have been #8 UGA and #9 Florida in 2007, #7 Alabama in 2008, #8 Virginia Tech in 2009, #8 Arkansas in 2010, and #7 Wisconsin and #9 USC in 2016. Sign me up for that please.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram