Started By
Message

re: Joe Mcknight's shooter, Ronald Gasser, released from custody

Posted on 12/2/16 at 2:42 pm to
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47814 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 2:42 pm to
I forgot in my post, UNARMED. So why does the gun come out? That should have ended things and no one would be dead.

Instead, he goes another step further and shoots it. That's where the line is crossed
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 2:44 pm to
Trayvon was unarmed, too.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

So why does the gun come out? That should have ended things and no one would be dead. Instead, he goes another step further and shoots it. That's where the line is crossed


So you were there? I didn't see the whole conference, was Gasser injured? Were McKnight's knuckles bruised?
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

chalmetteowl


listen, I'm not knighting for this guy, I think he will eventually be charged. I am just willing to trust JPSO when they say they are doing what they think is best in order to build a case, which is how I interpreted Newell's comments at the end of the conference.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

I forgot in my post, UNARMED. So why does the gun come out? That should have ended things and no one would be dead.

Instead, he goes another step further and shoots it. That's where the line is crossed


Maybe he didn't want to risk his life fighting a 200lb professional athlete?

I'm not saying the shooter doesn't deserve blame, but I take issue with the idea that we should have fist fights with strangers who can obviously overpower us instead of using the means of self defense to prevent them from harming us.

On the other side, though, I don't think people should get off scot free if they willingly participate in a road rage argument that ends up with the other person dead.
If you aren't willing to deal with someone without shooting them, don't talk shite.
Posted by Douboy
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2007
4332 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

I forgot in my post, UNARMED. So why does the gun come out? That should have ended things and no one would be dead.


You just changed your entire argument.

If this is truly a self defense situation, how would the shooter know if the attacker was unarmed? Was he given the opportunity to frisk him first?
Posted by Geauxtexastyger
Member since Dec 2014
559 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

I forgot in my post, UNARMED. So why does the gun come out? That should have ended things and no one would be dead.


Very few psychologists on this board.....the issue is whether or not it was a criminal act....based on the statute it doesn't appear to be.

LINK
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
12977 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

I forgot in my post, UNARMED. So why does the gun come out? That should have ended things and no one would be dead.

Instead, he goes another step further and shoots it. That's where the line is crossed


There's no duty nor obligation to threaten to shoot someone. If that level of force is justified, you take it. If you reasonably believe you are at risk of being attacked with lethal force or serious bodily injury, you have the right to defend yourself without first threatening your assailant.
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
45372 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

I forgot in my post, UNARMED. So why does the gun come out?

We don't know.
quote:

That should have ended things and no one would be dead.

We don't know that.
quote:

Instead, he goes another step further and shoots it. That's where the line is crossed

We don't know that based on what we know. Maybe, maybe not.

You are entitled to use deadly force to protect yourself even if the other party does not have a gun.

And I don't know if the use of deadly force is justified here. Neither do you. You can't know based on the info we have.
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 5:35 pm to
quote:

I forgot in my post, UNARMED. So why does the gun come out? That should have ended things and no one would be dead.

Instead, he goes another step further and shoots it. That's where the line is crossed



If the guy went after him to physically harm him, I don't see the issue here. the guy was reportedly in his own property.

You let people just walk up in your house and frick with you?


Don't answer that.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram