Both. It's a whole lot of stupid on both of them.

It's obvious gasser had anger issues. Seems in this scenario he met someone with more on that particular day.
He also comes across as possibly a crappy driver as he is the common denominator.

This post was edited on 12/4/16 at 10:14 am

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by tgrbaitn08

Member since Dec 2007

146214 posts

Posted on 12/4/16 at 10:18 am to Nado Jenkins83

I agree. They both have a history of anger issues and they both have a history of being crappy drivers. That's why I asked LE which one he was referring to.

JM should have kept his anger in check and driven off or stayed in his car.

Gasser probably would have kept driving if he hadn't gotten boxed in at the red light. I don't see where Gasser attempted to exit his car to confront JM.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by REG861

Ocelot, Iowa

Member since Oct 2011

36444 posts

Posted on 12/4/16 at 10:20 am to Nado Jenkins83

quote:
Both. It's a whole lot of stupid on both of them.

It's obvious gasser had anger issues. Seems in this scenario he met someone with more on that particular day.
He also comes across as possibly a crappy driver as he is the common denominator.

I agree with you here. I'm not trying to paint JM as an angel or Gasser as a depraved maniac. Both fricked up. It's when people are trying to completely exonerate Gasser or portray him as the victim that I can't wrap my mind around, especially when they rush to judge McKnight on the most ludicrous logical grounds (ie Dabigafella). At the very least this should go to a grand jury. I just want an impartial justice system.

This post was edited on 12/4/16 at 10:37 am

1 ...

Report Post

O-T Lounge - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board