Started By
Message

re: Liberal Misunderstanding of "trickle down economics"

Posted on 12/1/16 at 4:47 pm to
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28733 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 4:47 pm to
And what will be the impact of the federal government forcing higher expenses than necessary at companies all around the country? How will our businesses compete globally? What sort of trade policies will be required to protect our weighted-down corporations from closing up shop? How many jobs are we willing to put in jeopardy to save 1000?
Posted by ibleedprplngld
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jan 2012
4318 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 5:54 pm to
Where do expect these additional costs to come from? Taxes? No, pretty sure that's part of the package. COB? Nah. Prices? Lowering the COB generally results in lower and stable prices, so no. Sales? Supply and demand, lost costs usually equal lower prices, lower prices equal higher demand, so that's out too. Where exactly do you expect these higher expenses to come from? No matter what policies are imposed, businesses will do what is best for the business. Obviously this deal was in the best interest of Carrier.
Posted by mofungoo
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2012
4583 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 6:15 pm to
He triggered
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 5:57 am to
quote:

And what will be the impact of the federal government forcing higher expenses than necessary at companies all around the country? How will our businesses compete globally? What sort of trade policies will be required to protect our weighted-down corporations from closing up shop? How many jobs are we willing to put in jeopardy to save 1000?


What the actual frick are you babbling about?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram