Started By
Message

re: For those bashing Briles

Posted on 11/29/16 at 2:05 pm to
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21825 posts
Posted on 11/29/16 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Baylor's insurance carrier made the decision to settle based on advice from the school's attys.


Why? Why does their insurance carrier care so much about Baylor's reputation to shell out ~20 million dollars, even though it doesn't have to (assuming the termination was appropriate)?

They're already opening their wallets in preparation for the lawsuits several women have brought against the University already. You'd think they'd be trying to pinch off needless 20 million dollar expenses. Speaking of which, the details of the sexual assaults and the cover up will be aired during these lawsuits anyways.

quote:

Baylor was just as guilty as Briles with regards to the cover up. The settlement addresses nothing about Briles' guilt, it was just a legal decision to continue to cover up all the shite that happened. Briles is no victim by any means.


We're talking very serious criminal charges here... Have any been pressed, are the feds dragging their feet, is there much of a case? What's up? This scandal is well over a year old.
This post was edited on 11/29/16 at 2:18 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram