quote:
But the worst case scenario for people on this board is that his guy couldn't get a gun, tried to commit a mass killing, and couldn't kill one person. It's a success.

Actually, that is one of the best outcomes.

That way, when you anti-2nd Amendment individuals state that we need stronger gun control, we can just point to this and say, "no we don't".

What we have obviously worked.

That is actually the worst outcome for those of you who oppose citizens' rights to defend themselves.

This post was edited on 11/28/16 at 11:43 am

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by olddawg26

Member since Jan 2013

24641 posts

Posted on 11/28/16 at 11:43 am to Scruffy

You're a psycho even thinking I'm "anti 2nd amendment".

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by RogerTheShrubber

Juneau, AK

Member since Jan 2009

262883 posts

Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:01 pm to Scruffy

quote:

That is actually the worst outcome for those of you who oppose citizens' rights to defend themselves.

Umm hmmm.

They'll still be terrified of guns though, pre-existing programming.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Loserman

Member since Sep 2007

22009 posts

Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:04 pm to Scruffy

quote:
That is actually the worst outcome for those of you who oppose citizens' rights to defend themselves.

That is NOT what the second Amendment is about.

The 2nd Amendment is for us to protect ourselves from the Federal Government.

It is one of the major accomplishments of the Left to actually get people to think it is about self protection.
This is why they now frame their argument as to "why does anyone need an Assault Rifle" for personal defense?

Both are incorrect views.

Again...

We have a 2nd Amendment to protect ourselves from an overreaching tyrannical Federal Government.
Self defense is ancillary to the fundamental right.

3 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board