Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 11/27/16 at 9:13 am to
Posted by Murray
Member since Aug 2008
14434 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Elaborate Por favor


I think the South would've worked to strengthen their ties to Great Britain and Ireland immediately and aggressively work on patching up others(France).

We would've been involved sooner had the South won.
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
39988 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 9:16 am to
We were already sending copious amounts of aide to the Allies by the time of Pearl Harbor. But how would "the south" have prevented Pearl Harbor? Are we envisioning that the confederates control all of the continental US or that we have a United States and Confederate States?
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
66045 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 9:44 am to
quote:

I think the South would've worked to strengthen their ties to Great Britain and Ireland immediately and aggressively work on patching up others(France).
American Civil War (1861-65)
Republic of Ireland treaty of Independence from UK
-6 December 1921



OP: There wouldn't have been an Axis for WWII because there probably wouldn't have been the outcome of WWI that history saw.

There arguably might not have been a WWII.

Had the American Civil War ended with the South being independent, the course of history would have been altered. We'll never know how it would have been.
Posted by SEC. 593
Chicago
Member since Aug 2012
4055 posts
Posted on 11/27/16 at 10:25 am to
Didn't the Confederacy and the Nazi's have the same position on some very key elements? Specifically, the view on who and who didn't count as human.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram