Started By
Message

re: LSU Is Not and Never Has Been a Top 5 Program Historically

Posted on 11/20/16 at 2:07 pm to
Posted by Solo Cam
Member since Sep 2015
32713 posts
Posted on 11/20/16 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

Michigan and FSU below LSU
LSU pays more, has a better stadium, a better fan base, a top 10 (maybe top 5) state all to itself and it's in the SEC. That's why it's better than FSU.

Quality of players makes it better than Michigan. There's a reason why Jim H wants so damn desperately to set up satellite camps in the SEC states. Better athletes.
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 11/20/16 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

LSU pays more, has a better stadium, a better fan base, a top 10 (maybe top 5) state all to itself and it's in the SEC. That's why it's better than FSU.


The "in the SEC" argument really doesn't mean anything anymore. If anything I'd argue it's better to be a Clemson or an FSU as you only have to win that game each year, and you're in. The playoff has diminished the need to be from the absolute best conference in the land. If you're at a top school in one of the better conferences, you'll be fine.

quote:

Quality of players makes it better than Michigan. There's a reason why Jim H wants so damn desperately to set up satellite camps in the SEC states. Better athletes.


In a year Harbaugh will turn that roster over and have it humming like a well-oiled machine. It will be the same thing Ohio State did with Meyer. Those programs recruit the entire country. You could make an argument that the Michigan helmet and uni is below only things like the Yankee pinstripes and the Cowboy star as the most iconic imagine in all of sports let alone college football. I love LSU, but it's brand will never touch Michigan's, period.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram