- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
WIKILEAKS does not have control of their infrastructure
Posted on 11/18/16 at 5:30 pm
Posted on 11/18/16 at 5:30 pm
6
Posted on 11/18/16 at 5:32 pm to Rascal
Okay, dude. Whatever.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 5:32 pm to Rascal
Not touching that weird blind leak, bro.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 5:43 pm to Rascal
That's a bunch of LARPing bullshite.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 6:58 pm to Rascal
Wouldn't doubt it. Still haven't seen any proof of life from Assange, but why would they base their encryption key release off of something in the US? That makes no sense. Why would they also only have the stuff in a few spots? It would also seem like it would be pretty easy to confirm who he is.
Fake on this, but jury is still out on what happened to Assange and the other Wikileaks guys who were actually confirmed captured
Fake on this, but jury is still out on what happened to Assange and the other Wikileaks guys who were actually confirmed captured
This post was edited on 11/18/16 at 7:02 pm
Posted on 11/19/16 at 2:19 am to Rascal
More information and timeline
Lots of info here
Found this most interesting. Full purge of WL mods without an official peep on it? Followed by all threads on Assange being MIA deleted.
Insurance files released on Nov 14 do not match the pre-released hashes tweeted out that were to be used to confirm authenticity of future release.
Additional info in thread indicates that WL operators previously utilized identifying hashes to authenticate the source of communications. IE Assange would have his own particular hash included on a communication that would act as an identification tag. Wikileaks is no longer signing anything.
Lots of info here
Found this most interesting. Full purge of WL mods without an official peep on it? Followed by all threads on Assange being MIA deleted.
Insurance files released on Nov 14 do not match the pre-released hashes tweeted out that were to be used to confirm authenticity of future release.
Additional info in thread indicates that WL operators previously utilized identifying hashes to authenticate the source of communications. IE Assange would have his own particular hash included on a communication that would act as an identification tag. Wikileaks is no longer signing anything.
This post was edited on 11/19/16 at 2:24 am
Posted on 11/19/16 at 6:31 am to Rascal
Well, maybe they shouldn't have waited so long to release what they had.
If this stuff is as big as they are claiming it is, why sit on it and take so long to release it?
If this stuff is as big as they are claiming it is, why sit on it and take so long to release it?
This post was edited on 11/19/16 at 6:33 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News