- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
WIKILEAKS does not have control of their infrastructure
Posted on 11/18/16 at 5:30 pm
Posted on 11/18/16 at 5:30 pm
6
Posted on 11/18/16 at 5:32 pm to Rascal
Okay, dude. Whatever.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 5:32 pm to Rascal
Not touching that weird blind leak, bro.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 5:33 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Not touching that weird blind leak, bro.
click his link to enlarge the image
otherwise...
Posted on 11/18/16 at 5:36 pm to hawgfaninc
feels like a scam to stop whistleblowers from submitting their info to wikileaks
Posted on 11/18/16 at 5:39 pm to hawgfaninc
I am definitely on the train with the something happened to Jullian people. I dont know about all the conspiracy theories going around, or pizzagate and all that. But I do believe that he was taken to somewhere and that Wikileaks is no longer in control of their network.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 5:39 pm to hawgfaninc
yea I'm gonna call bullshite
Posted on 11/18/16 at 5:41 pm to Paedin
quote:
I am definitely on the train with the something happened to Jullian people.
why do you think this?
Posted on 11/18/16 at 5:43 pm to Paedin
quote:
I am definitely on the train with the something happened to Jullian people. I dont know about all the conspiracy theories going around, or pizzagate and all that. But I do believe that he was taken to somewhere and that Wikileaks is no longer in control of their network.
Agreed. It's been far to long with no definitive proof of life of Assange, and too many odd things for it to be nothing.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 5:43 pm to Rascal
That's a bunch of LARPing bullshite.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 5:43 pm to hawgfaninc
Wikileaks was compromised the day the Internet went down on the east coast. Oct 21. This is known.
This post was edited on 11/18/16 at 6:22 pm
Posted on 11/18/16 at 5:53 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
feels like a scam to stop whistleblowers from submitting their info to wikileaks
This.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 6:58 pm to Rascal
Wouldn't doubt it. Still haven't seen any proof of life from Assange, but why would they base their encryption key release off of something in the US? That makes no sense. Why would they also only have the stuff in a few spots? It would also seem like it would be pretty easy to confirm who he is.
Fake on this, but jury is still out on what happened to Assange and the other Wikileaks guys who were actually confirmed captured
Fake on this, but jury is still out on what happened to Assange and the other Wikileaks guys who were actually confirmed captured
This post was edited on 11/18/16 at 7:02 pm
Posted on 11/18/16 at 7:28 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
yea I'm gonna call bullshite
Well we don't need you to call bullshite. Let's see if wikileaks calls bullshite.
Posted on 11/19/16 at 2:19 am to Rascal
More information and timeline
Lots of info here
Found this most interesting. Full purge of WL mods without an official peep on it? Followed by all threads on Assange being MIA deleted.
Insurance files released on Nov 14 do not match the pre-released hashes tweeted out that were to be used to confirm authenticity of future release.
Additional info in thread indicates that WL operators previously utilized identifying hashes to authenticate the source of communications. IE Assange would have his own particular hash included on a communication that would act as an identification tag. Wikileaks is no longer signing anything.
Lots of info here
Found this most interesting. Full purge of WL mods without an official peep on it? Followed by all threads on Assange being MIA deleted.
Insurance files released on Nov 14 do not match the pre-released hashes tweeted out that were to be used to confirm authenticity of future release.
Additional info in thread indicates that WL operators previously utilized identifying hashes to authenticate the source of communications. IE Assange would have his own particular hash included on a communication that would act as an identification tag. Wikileaks is no longer signing anything.
This post was edited on 11/19/16 at 2:24 am
Posted on 11/19/16 at 3:21 am to LSUnation78
We're all pretty sure something nefarious is going down at this point, its just what?
I hope that all their safeguards they had built really do work and kick in. Wikileaks serves humanity in a vital way.
I hope that all their safeguards they had built really do work and kick in. Wikileaks serves humanity in a vital way.
Posted on 11/19/16 at 3:45 am to Paedin
Posted on 11/19/16 at 6:31 am to Rascal
Well, maybe they shouldn't have waited so long to release what they had.
If this stuff is as big as they are claiming it is, why sit on it and take so long to release it?
If this stuff is as big as they are claiming it is, why sit on it and take so long to release it?
This post was edited on 11/19/16 at 6:33 am
Posted on 11/19/16 at 3:13 pm to PrimeTime Money
Bump
Posted on 11/19/16 at 6:08 pm to LSUnation78
Something that has concerned me for a while - the last Assange interview was released on November 5th where he said:
"If you look at the history of the FBI, it has become effectively America's political police. The FBI demonstrated this by taking down the former head of the CIA [General David Petraeus] over classified information given to his mistress. Almost no-one is untouchable. The FBI is always trying to demonstrate that no-one can resist us. But Hillary Clinton very conspicuously resisted the FBI's investigation, so there’s anger within the FBI because it made the FBI look weak. We've published about 33,000 of Clinton's emails when she was Secretary of State. They come from a batch of just over 60,000 emails, [of which] Clinton has kept about half – 30,000 -- to herself, and we've published about half."
Where are the clinton emails? When the interview with Assange took place, he had been cut off from the internet for some time and may have thought the emails had been released.
LINK /
"If you look at the history of the FBI, it has become effectively America's political police. The FBI demonstrated this by taking down the former head of the CIA [General David Petraeus] over classified information given to his mistress. Almost no-one is untouchable. The FBI is always trying to demonstrate that no-one can resist us. But Hillary Clinton very conspicuously resisted the FBI's investigation, so there’s anger within the FBI because it made the FBI look weak. We've published about 33,000 of Clinton's emails when she was Secretary of State. They come from a batch of just over 60,000 emails, [of which] Clinton has kept about half – 30,000 -- to herself, and we've published about half."
Where are the clinton emails? When the interview with Assange took place, he had been cut off from the internet for some time and may have thought the emails had been released.
LINK /
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News