Started By
Message

re: Would losing a game be better long term?

Posted on 11/16/16 at 2:32 pm to
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
18154 posts
Posted on 11/16/16 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

No, but losing "fans" like you would be better in the long term.


ah, there it is -- the allegation that you're not a true "fan" if you think losing another game (in what is already a 3-loss season) would actually help the program in the long-term.

Maybe the poster is just thinking longer-term than 2016. Maybe he's thinking about the next 10 years, instead of just satisfaction for the next 10 days.

The immaturity on this board never ceases to amaze me.
This post was edited on 11/16/16 at 2:33 pm
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57343 posts
Posted on 11/16/16 at 3:25 pm to
I'd be willing to wager that LSU would only have one loss if O had been the coach from the first game. We would lost to neither Wisconsin nor Auburn. Both of those losses were on Les.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram