quote:
Never thought I'd say this, but the truth is we would have had much more success running Guice against Bama than we did Fournette. While Fournette is way more physically gifted, Guice has better vision and is shiftier getting through smaller holes.

Does not matter who we have running the ball. When you play teams like Bama they are good enough to expose your weakness which is QB play. Guice with more carries might of had a more yards but not much more than what Leonard Had. But I do agree he has better vision and is shiftier than LF. I might be more excited about him next year than any running back we have had in the past 10 years. He is one helluva player and exciting to watch. I think Leonard is more suited for the NFL and will do very well. Both are great students and leaders of LSU. Glad they are on our side

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Scoob

Near Exxon

Member since Jun 2009

20454 posts

Posted on 11/14/16 at 11:36 am to Fanofages

quote:
Does not matter who we have running the ball. When you play teams like Bama they are good enough to expose your weakness which is QB play. Guice with more carries might of had a more yards but not much more than what Leonard Had. But I do agree he has better vision and is shiftier than LF. I might be more excited about him next year than any running back we have had in the past 10 years. He is one helluva player and exciting to watch. I think Leonard is more suited for the NFL and will do very well.

This might be heresy on this board, but Guice might have the better career, based on what we've seen.

Fournette is not going to see defenses like Ole Miss in the NFL; the Alabama defense will be a lot more like it. He's going to have to settle for 4 yd gains a lot more.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Coupe

Pace, Florida

Member since Oct 2007

36 posts

Posted on 11/14/16 at 4:29 pm to Fanofages

I agree

0 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board