Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 11/11/16 at 10:51 am to
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 11/11/16 at 10:51 am to
quote:

We have no idea who would have won if it was a straight popular vote
that's what i'm saying. The common thought by everyone (including dems which is why they want it) is that they'd win every single election

i'm not convinced of that. I don't know how it would go, but I suspect that like you said, it could go either way and generally speaking the macro results would be pretty much the same...but i'm just saying it's a possibility. We don't use it for many reasons, many really fricking good reasons.
Posted by graves1
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Mar 2011
2149 posts
Posted on 11/11/16 at 11:03 am to
The issue I have with the EC is the way the votes are distributed. We all know the the EC basically goes by census numbers. The census counts every person. Persons counted in the census include citizens, legal immigrants, non-citizen long-term visitors and illegal (or undocumented) immigrants. Not counting illegal aliens costs cities and states federal money, resulting in a reduction of services to all residents.

According to ruff numbers from the election results, around 8.5 million people voted in California. New York had roughly 7.9 million voters. But California gets 55 EV vs New York only 29 EV. So a vote in California is worth more than a vote in New York.

I know HRC won both states, but how many other states reflect higher voter turn out with less EV.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram