- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: .
Posted on 11/10/16 at 12:39 pm to DelU249
Posted on 11/10/16 at 12:39 pm to DelU249
quote:
Nate Silver isnt the wiz kid you made him out to be. no need to defend and apologize. He's totally discredited.
NO.
the clown, buckeye, will be here soon to defend nate plastic.
and then tell you how it wasnt his fault.
Posted on 11/10/16 at 12:45 pm to CptBengal
The pollsters are defending themselves exactly as I predicted
Silver was so defensive about any questioning of polls and his model. His fanboys just pointed to 2012 and the the later primaries...bozos
Silver was so defensive about any questioning of polls and his model. His fanboys just pointed to 2012 and the the later primaries...bozos
Posted on 11/10/16 at 1:04 pm to CptBengal
quote:Present.
the clown, buckeye, will be here soon to defend nate plastic.
quote:What was he supposed to do? Pretend the data weren't leaning towards a Clinton victory. Look at how much more realistic their models were compared to everybody else.
and then tell you how it wasnt his fault.
In fact, 538 had two articles (one in September and one a week before election) discussing the real possibility of Trump losing the popular vote but winning the Electoral College.
Besides, what about in 2012 where you were predicting a Romney victory with 300+ electoral votes? As a statistician yourself, aren't you critical of your misses as well?
This post was edited on 11/10/16 at 1:08 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News