Started By
Message

re: tOfficial Nate Silver fail thread

Posted on 11/9/16 at 11:17 am to
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35242 posts
Posted on 11/9/16 at 11:17 am to
quote:

There will be a few luddites that will be on here shortly to tell you that Nate Velcro was within 30% of getting it right, so he was essentially the closest to reality
So given the polling information, Trump losing the popular vote, and the margins in swing states, what do you think the probability of this outcome was beforehand?
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
27972 posts
Posted on 11/9/16 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

what do you think the probability of this outcome was beforehand?

I have been telling you since Day 1 that I had the same info as Nate, and was banking on a Trump win. Trump had the same numbers as Nate, and knew that Penn, Mich, and Wisc was winnable and went there. Clintonistas used Nates 'view' and never went one time to Wisc. Not once

Yet Nate had Trump at 15%, around a week out.

Sorry his algorithm is shite, and biased. Based on voting patterns that he pines for, not what is fairly well known thru research. Basically, hes lazy
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 11/9/16 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

o given the polling information


You said that wasn't rigged.

Lolzy.

quote:

buckeye_vol


Beg waiting for you to show up
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram