I have no desire to see Ghostbusters so i can't speak on it, but this board did the exact same for Suicide Squad and Batman V Superman.

They hadn't been out 24 hours before they were deemed the worst two films in the history of cinema. You kind of just have to assume that 80% or so of the criticisms here are people just trying to be the 'guy' that hates the movie the most.

Both of those films could have been better, but if a movie isn't up for an Academy Award, it's shite here.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by CocomoLSU

Inside your dome.

Member since Feb 2004

150868 posts

Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:21 am to McCaigBro69

quote:
Suicide Squad and Batman V Superman.

They hadn't been out 24 hours before they were deemed the worst two films in the history of cinema

I haven't seen SS yet, but BvS was pretty fricking bad. And I had no expectations for it going in.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Ace Midnight

Between sanity and madness

Member since Dec 2006

89622 posts

Posted on 10/24/16 at 10:37 am to McCaigBro69

quote:
Both of those films could have been better, but if a movie isn't up for an Academy Award, it's shite here.

I'm definitely not talking about Suicide Squad, because I literally could not care less about the product, anyone involved (which I can't tell you) or anything about it. Just not in my wheelhouse, I guess.

As for Ghostbusters, the stunt casting pretty much excluded my ever watching it, unless it killed it in reviews. It did not. Stupid stunt casting is still stupid stunt casting.

Ditto for Affleck as Batman - I was already on the bubble about Superman - I watched the first movie - I liked it - I didn't love it. With Affleck as Batman and pipe cleaner arms as WW, that pretty much did it for me. I don't begrudge folks out there who liked it, but I'm passing.

Life's too short to get too twisted up about most movies. I save my outrage for real travesties - like Star Trek from 2009 to present.

0 ...

Report Post

Movie/TV Board - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board