Started By
Message

re: Clayton Kershaw 4-6 with a 4.39 ERA In The Playoffs For His Career

Posted on 10/23/16 at 11:46 am to
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145375 posts
Posted on 10/23/16 at 11:46 am to
quote:

The fact of the matter is that to this point, he's not getting the job done.
Except when he does
quote:

Your argument should be that it's not likely to continue based on x and y
which I do all the time
quote:

Arguing he hasn't been bad is silly.
except it really isn't cause he really hasn't been that bad. All of this hand wringing is literally over 2 crappy starts to St Louis

For example, since 2013, this is his era once you take out game 6 of the 2013 NLCS and game 1 of the 2014 NLDS, 2.86. Is that frick you dominate like he usually is? No. But is that really so bad to where we have this idiotic narrative that he can't pitch in the postseason? frick no. He had two bad starts years ago and since then, he's been pretty damn good and has had multiple starts where he absolutely shut the opponent down. Even on the road in elimination games like last year against the Mets
This post was edited on 10/23/16 at 11:54 am
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279464 posts
Posted on 10/23/16 at 12:15 pm to
when you have sub 2.00 ERA's and 3 cy young's, sample size shouldnt even matter. You are supposed to go out there and dominate. Just the fact that we are even talking about this tells us that he is a different player.

84IP is a small sample size? Are you people fricking serious?

how many times do you need the guy who routinely blanks people in the reg season to give up 4ER or 5ER in order for the sample size to be valid?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram