Started By
Message

re: Spinoff: Why does Everybody Attribute Super Bowls with Quarterbacks?

Posted on 10/16/16 at 5:55 pm to
Posted by gobuxgo5
Member since Nov 2012
10031 posts
Posted on 10/16/16 at 5:55 pm to
Yeah why would the 1 person who makes a crucial decision with the ball for 50% of the game be valued over a DE or TE?
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12721 posts
Posted on 10/16/16 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

Yeah why would the 1 person who makes a crucial decision with the ball for 50% of the game be valued over a DE or TE?


If you're trolling, bad troll.

I mean, let's face it, when someone (including myself) uses the Super Bowl argument, it's not including guys like Dilfer.

But for any stooge to question the significance of Super Bowls when EVERY EXPERT harps on Super Bowl victories as it relates to the QB position...well, it's just stupid.

Every knocked Manning for years for not being able to win one. It was the one thing seperating him from Elite status. Then it was can he get 2?

Is it a fool proof argument? No. But neither is "Brees is the best because Stats."
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 10/16/16 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

Yeah why would the 1 person who makes a crucial decision with the ball for 50% of the game be valued over a DE or TE?


So you value Trent Dilfer over Dan Marino? What about Russell Wilson at the moment? You know Dan Marino, probably the most physically gifted throwing quarterback of all time. And even though Manning has over 10,000 more yards than Brady, over 100 more TD's than Brady, and higher yds/game and completion percentage than Brady...somehow...Brady is better.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram