Started By
Message

re: Buyer paying the Buyer Agent a fee

Posted on 10/10/16 at 10:06 am to
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37185 posts
Posted on 10/10/16 at 10:06 am to
I would not pay it. I certainly would not sign a contract that had that language.

The buyer splits commission with the seller. End of story.

Now... I always thought that was stupid.

To me, a better system would be... each side pays their agent whatever they negotiate. Sellers pay 3% to their person, Buyers pay 3% to their person. No conflict of interest, and either side is free to negotiate different terms (or not have representation at all).

Prices would adjust, of course, to this new world.
Posted by ItNeverRains
37069
Member since Oct 2007
25678 posts
Posted on 10/10/16 at 11:13 am to
quote:

To me, a better system would be... each side pays their agent whatever they negotiate. Sellers pay 3% to their person, Buyers pay 3% to their person. No conflict of interest, and either side is free to negotiate different terms (or not have representation at all). Prices would adjust, of course, to this new world.


As a buyer I'd rather finance my agents fee into the purchase price, especially at 3.5% interest over 30 years. Closing costs and 20% down is enough cash out of pocket in my book.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram