Started By
Message

re: Woman sent graphic nude photos of herself to her ex's teen son after breakup

Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:10 am to
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134899 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:10 am to
quote:

Oh give me a fricking break.

So at 17, he could legally frick her but can't see a nude pic of her?


Laws are fricked up.

Not that he wanted it but I'm sure he at least looked.


Yeah, those laws are fricking retarded. Didn't a teenage girl get hit with a possession of child porn because she had nude pics of herself on her phone?
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124604 posts
Posted on 9/29/16 at 8:31 am to
quote:

Yeah, those laws are fricking retarded. Didn't a teenage girl get hit with a possession of child porn because she had nude pics of herself on her phone?


It's stupid puritanical "for the children" laws like this that piss me off to no end.

There is no logic behind them.

I was told once "if you're old enough to drive to the store you're old enough to get bred".

throughout most of history, by 16 you were either pregnant or training to fight in a war.

You are not a child anymore in your mid teens.

You may be stupid as hell, but let's not act like they are little kids still.

The fact that two teenagers sending some racy pics back and forth could get them on a sex offender list or worse is absurd.

I mean, guys and gals of the OT, are you telling me that at 16-17 you weren't diddling some kitty any chance you got?

If you can see it with your eyes it isn't much different than seeing it on a screen.
It's just easier for everyone else to see it too.

High time we had a real conversation about the reality of today without the moralistic grandstanding
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram