Started By
Message

re: I mean, is anyone really that surprised?

Posted on 9/27/16 at 11:06 am to
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25418 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 11:06 am to
quote:

Well we did well after that


quote:

(Grayson was the worst pick of the draft)



we did well after that except for the pick that was even worse. You are lying to yourself and desperate for any positive way to spin this.

quote:

PJ Williams - looks like a starting corner


You do not start if you do not play.

quote:

Swann - looks good. Hopefully can come back from concussions


You do not contribute if you do not play.

quote:

Davison


One good pick so far.

quote:

I'm not ready to give up on Anthony either.


Who is giving up on anything? What about "does not look good so far" do you not understand? You are lying if you say that he had looked fine for the investment so far. He could turn it around and being an optimist I am hoping for it, but the prognosis does not look good.

quote:

And then you add Breaux to that


Great player. But let's break down what has been said so far. That makes it 2/8 including Breaux, maybe 3/9 if you include Murphy being a decent special teams contributer. That is the definition of "mostly bad with few bright spots." Which is exactly what I said. Sure, they didn't hit 0%, but is that really the standard you want to measure as a success?
This post was edited on 9/27/16 at 11:08 am
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 9/27/16 at 11:18 am to
quote:

we did well after that except for the pick that was even worse


Yes, almost like there are multiple picks in a draft. Crazy

quote:

You do not start if you do not play.


So this freak injury makes him a bust and not part of the future? No, his injuries don't make him a bad pick at this point. That is hindsight

quote:

You do not contribute if you do not play.



zero concussions at Georgia. Your logic is faulty

quote:

That is the definition of "mostly bad with few bright spots." Which is exactly what I said. Sure, they didn't hit 0%, but is that really the standard you want to measure as a success?



We have a lot of potential starters and contributors to the future out of that draft.

Talent evaluation was not an issue in that draft. If you want to lose confidence in Ireland b/c of freak concussions to 2 players, go for it. That is silly

quote:

That makes it 2/8 including Breaux


Peat - long term starter at G
Breaux - potential long term starter at corner
Williams - potential long term starter at corner
Davison - potential long term start at DT
Murphy - 7th round special teamer

So even leaving off Kikaha and Swann due to injury, while also ignoring what Anthony showed in his rookie season, getting long term starters out of a draft is a success. You draft on potential, and getting 4+ potential starters in a draft is a good thing. The only injury you can put on the front office is Kikaha.

The 2015 draft was not a bad draft. It had mistakes and it had positives.

This post was edited on 9/27/16 at 11:22 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram