Started By
Message

re: Mother And Son Charged With Incest

Posted on 9/14/16 at 8:30 am to
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124753 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 8:30 am to
The thing is, once you destroy the long standing definition of marriage, you have no ground with which to deny these folks since all that is required is that they "love each other".


Love wins, right?

I mean, people called this a while back.
Posted by CidCock
Member since Sep 2007
Member since Feb 2011
8631 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 8:35 am to
What if one of them was unable to produce offspring? Or heck, just have one of those lovely abortions.

Love wins.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 8:39 am to
quote:


I do believe he's raising the argument about homosexual relationships.

The incest has come up with the "stay out of my bedroom" argument during the whole same-sex marriage argument.

There is a point to it in the argument. Just to show a level of hypocrisy.



One results in no babies, the other results in special needs incest babies.

Also, the authority/nurturer figure portion of it is incredibly fricked up.

If people seriously lump those together, they should be neutered.

Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 8:40 am to
quote:

i am dan


You are defending incest.

Think about that.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 8:41 am to
quote:

I mean, people called this a while back.


Called what?

Incest has actually gotten more illegal throughout history. These people were arrested and charged with it.

What did people call exactly?
Posted by Mouthulcer
Metairie
Member since Feb 2015
639 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 8:45 am to
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
78143 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 8:50 am to
I bet that mom was hot 25 yrs ago
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124753 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 8:53 am to
quote:

What did people call exactly?


That the argument against incestuous marriage pretty much dissolves once you allow gay marriage.

I don't care but you can't logically defend the latter and not the former.
Posted by CidCock
Member since Sep 2007
Member since Feb 2011
8631 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 8:55 am to
I concur.

Many find each repulsive.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83992 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 8:56 am to
quote:


One results in no babies, the other results in special needs incest babies


Again, not necessarily true. Also, there is a difference between "inbreeding" and "line breeding".
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 8:57 am to
quote:

That the argument against incestuous marriage pretty much dissolves once you allow gay marriage.

I don't care but you can't logically defend the latter and not the former.





WTF

If you can't discern between two unrelated people having a relationship and closely related people then you are hopeless.

Gay marriage isn't going to cause people to be ok with moms fricking their sons.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 8:58 am to
quote:

I concur.

Many find each repulsive.


No, a majority find one to be perfectly fine.

99.99% of people outside of Alabama find the other to be despicable.

Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:00 am to
Also, gay people think incest is disgusting as well. So if the very people you don't want to get a civil document for tax breaks think its despicable, who is going to make it socially acceptable?
Posted by Captain Crown
Member since Jun 2011
51100 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:01 am to
Nasty
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83992 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:02 am to
quote:

Also, gay people think incest is disgusting as well.


Well, in many cases they won't have the opportunity to find out, will they?

Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:04 am to
quote:

Well, in many cases they won't have the opportunity to find out, will they?



I know you’re kidding, but what does this even mean?

Do you have to participate in incest to find out it’s disgusting?
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83992 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:05 am to
Geez it was just a joke
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56578 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:05 am to
Shaun,

MILF does not mean your own, simple misunderstanding
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124753 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:07 am to
Of course I can. But the logic put forth of "two people who love each other and should therefore be able to get married" is what was argued for the gay marriage stuff.

You'd deny two people that love each other the chance to get married Now?



You horrible bigot.

And the risks, studies have shown, Aren't really all that high.

Being a woman in your late 30s and beyond carries more risk in reproduction. As someone said earlier, are you going to stop them from having kids?

If marriage is about reproduction, then gay people would have no leg to stand on.

If it's about love then you have an unfair double standard stopping "two people in love".



I'm not in favor of incest but this is the can of worms that gets opened when you destroy the definition of something and muddle it into gobbledygook.

This post was edited on 9/14/16 at 9:13 am
Posted by blueridgeTiger
Granbury, TX
Member since Jun 2004
20407 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 9:07 am to
quote:

ASHEVILLE


I didn't see this on the evening news locally.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram