- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should NCAA grant Oklahoma State the victory?
Posted on 9/12/16 at 10:26 pm to gumbeaux
Posted on 9/12/16 at 10:26 pm to gumbeaux
To me the rule should change to have allowed for that untimed down. If a team is leading and commits a turnover and a penalty against the offense occurs there should be an untimed down. As for the question the answer is no.
1
Posted on 9/13/16 at 11:04 am to ATCKyle87
quote:
To me the rule should change to have allowed for that untimed down. If a team is leading and commits a turnover and a penalty against the offense occurs there should be an untimed down. As for the question the answer is no.
That's my opinion too. You should NEVER be officially rewarded for breaking the rules.
It seems to me the rule about no untimed play makes sense only if it is not 4th down. When there's no change of possession, you would be rewarded by getting an extra play, and the current rule prevents that, but in the very specific situation we saw, where there is a change in possession, calling the rule as written rewards you for 'cheating'.
What the rules committee ought to do is publish a clarification that makes what the refs did the correct call from now on.
Does the NCAA have a catch-all rule about 'the refs can do whatever, to keep the game fair'?
This post was edited on 9/13/16 at 11:06 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News