Started By
Message

re: Harry Potter and the Cursed Child Review/discussion (SPOILERS)

Posted on 9/12/16 at 6:29 pm to
Posted by Bham4Tide
In a Van down by the River
Member since Feb 2011
22092 posts
Posted on 9/12/16 at 6:29 pm to
It certainly is very far off from the magic of the previous written material and it can't be thought (at least I can't think of it as such) as a continuation of the written narrative. It doesn't fit and I think most of the negatives have come from people expecting a continuation of such.

However, I can see it as the play, even a film. If they clean up some of the changes and can cast great actors for (spoilers) Albus and Scorpius Malfoy, it fits way better as a film. And, of course, they would need the main characters back and in bigger roles than the script has now, especially for Radcliffe.

I do like his take on it though:

The 27-year-old actor said: “I’m never going to close the door; that would be a stupid thing to do."

“But I think I’ll be happy enough and secure enough to let someone else play it.

“There’s a part of me that’s like, some things are better left untouched.

“If we went back to Potter, there’s a chance we’d make what Star Wars: The Force Awakens was to the original Star Wars, but there’s also the chance that we’d make Phantom Menace.

“So I don’t want to go back to anything like that and maybe sour what people have already loved.”

LINK
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram