Started By
Message

re: Why was CJ Spiller Inactive?

Posted on 9/12/16 at 7:49 am to
Posted by 9BREES9
Thibodaux
Member since Jan 2009
1375 posts
Posted on 9/12/16 at 7:49 am to
Not sure but it's kind of weird that he sent that cryptic tweet out earlier in the week and he's a healthy scratch. That's an expensive inactive player. To me, against a team like Oakland, you would want Spiller in there. Maybe he is getting traded and they didn't want to risk injury.
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77649 posts
Posted on 9/12/16 at 7:51 am to
quote:

Maybe he is getting traded and they didn't want to risk injury.


What corners can we get for him?
Posted by LCA131
Home of the Fake Sig lines
Member since Feb 2008
72616 posts
Posted on 9/12/16 at 7:53 am to
I missed it...what was the tweet?
Posted by redneck
Los Suenos, Costa Rica
Member since Dec 2003
53629 posts
Posted on 9/12/16 at 8:15 am to
quote:

Maybe he is getting traded and they didn't want to risk injury.


dear god Eli is going to rape us with Cruz and Beckham. If CJ is getting traded we can only pray it's for a somewhat decent corner or a defensive lineman that can at least pressure the QB
Posted by Midget Death Squad
Meme Magic
Member since Oct 2008
24733 posts
Posted on 9/12/16 at 8:48 am to
quote:

Maybe he is getting traded and they didn't want to risk injury.



This was my thought yesterday as well. Nothing else makes sense. Why keep him on the roster at that salary if your plan is to keep him inactive? Especially since he was one who was rumored to be a potential cut. I can see it as a trade agreement is close or already made, so they were protecting him from injury.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram