Started By
Message

re: ranters reading too much into stats

Posted on 9/11/16 at 7:06 pm to
Posted by boweswi05
birmingham
Member since Aug 2016
5684 posts
Posted on 9/11/16 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

So your theory is that for three possessions we changed our offense then we changed back?



So you don't think we went back to original offense more in the 2nd half.

The why didn't Etling complete a 2nd half pass then if we didn't change back to running damn near every play
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70945 posts
Posted on 9/11/16 at 7:07 pm to
the play calling did not change in the second half

Etling was forced, for one reason or the other, to throw deeper balls in the second half

the formations were and scheme were not different. You are fricking dumb.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70945 posts
Posted on 9/11/16 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

So you don't think we went back to original offense more in the 2nd half.



dude, there is more to offense than just passing and running. The offensive scheme was still the exact damn same. The difference is that as soon as Etling missed a couple, they began running the ball more. The offense wasn't taken over by Les any more than it ever has been and Etling didn't have some 2nd quarter play calling advantage that Harris wasn't privy to. You're just making shite up.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram