- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ranters reading too much into stats
Posted on 9/11/16 at 7:06 pm to Macavity92
Posted on 9/11/16 at 7:06 pm to Macavity92
quote:
So your theory is that for three possessions we changed our offense then we changed back?
So you don't think we went back to original offense more in the 2nd half.
The why didn't Etling complete a 2nd half pass then if we didn't change back to running damn near every play
Posted on 9/11/16 at 7:07 pm to boweswi05
the play calling did not change in the second half
Etling was forced, for one reason or the other, to throw deeper balls in the second half
the formations were and scheme were not different. You are fricking dumb.
Etling was forced, for one reason or the other, to throw deeper balls in the second half
the formations were and scheme were not different. You are fricking dumb.
Posted on 9/11/16 at 7:19 pm to boweswi05
quote:
So you don't think we went back to original offense more in the 2nd half.
dude, there is more to offense than just passing and running. The offensive scheme was still the exact damn same. The difference is that as soon as Etling missed a couple, they began running the ball more. The offense wasn't taken over by Les any more than it ever has been and Etling didn't have some 2nd quarter play calling advantage that Harris wasn't privy to. You're just making shite up.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News