Started By
Message

People finally get punished for a frivolous lawsuit

Posted on 8/31/16 at 9:14 pm
Posted by cubsfan5150
Member since Nov 2007
15797 posts
Posted on 8/31/16 at 9:14 pm
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80427 posts
Posted on 8/31/16 at 9:17 pm to
How hard is your dick right now?
Posted by Cold Cous Cous
Bucktown, La.
Member since Oct 2003
15052 posts
Posted on 8/31/16 at 9:17 pm to
Good luck collecting on that.
Posted by BruslyTiger
Waiting on 420...
Member since Oct 2003
4620 posts
Posted on 8/31/16 at 9:23 pm to
Maybe they should have taken the settlement?
Posted by sneakytiger
Member since Oct 2007
2474 posts
Posted on 8/31/16 at 9:30 pm to
Was this a jury trial? If so
Posted by Barrister
Member since Jul 2012
4635 posts
Posted on 8/31/16 at 9:31 pm to
Frivolous? I'm not sure you understand what that word means
Posted by AUbagman
LA
Member since Jun 2014
10574 posts
Posted on 9/1/16 at 7:02 am to
This has been posted a while back, but it's a dumb move on their part. Write the legal fees off and move on. 700k is definitely not worth the bad publicity.
Posted by Grandioso
Driftwood, TX
Member since Dec 2015
1597 posts
Posted on 9/1/16 at 7:44 am to
How could this be a frivolous suit? I'm not an attorney, but I have read that certain industries (hotels and public transportation) are held to a much higher regard in terms of liability.

Could the movie theatre potentially have done something different to thwart this heinous attack? I know nothing about the suit, but for example:

-Movie theatre policy to staff 4 security guards around the cinema and on the day of the shooting, they only had 1 security guard scheduled to work.

-Movie theatre is supposed to monitor security cameras in and around the theatre during all working hours. The day of the incident, the security cameras were inoperable.

-Movie theatre was supposed to routinely check and keep secure all outdoor/fire exits and make sure they are shut. The day of the incident, the POS shooter came in through the back, fire door exit.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51417 posts
Posted on 9/1/16 at 7:54 am to
Didn't they have a settlement offer? The plaintiffs clearly should have taken that.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67593 posts
Posted on 9/1/16 at 8:26 am to
The attorneys should have to pay also
Posted by tiger7166
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2007
2627 posts
Posted on 9/1/16 at 8:47 am to
God I hope the contingency fee lawyers are on the hook for it!
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51417 posts
Posted on 9/14/16 at 12:19 pm to
Just read that the cinema has dropped the 700k request since the plaintiffs wisely agreed to not appeal the verdict of the lawsuit.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram