Started By
Message

re: "Fournettes on another level" - Todd McShay

Posted on 8/27/16 at 3:34 pm to
Posted by Guava Jelly
Bawston
Member since Jul 2009
11652 posts
Posted on 8/27/16 at 3:34 pm to
All of the measurables of Herschel and LF are similar. Saying that he is better based on your recollections and opinions of yore just doesn't make sense. We can all go back and watch old games and watch them run.

Many of us have seen those games dozens of times over. The fact of the matter is you can put the films alongside each other (as has been done) and there is little or no objective difference in athletic ability.

The point that I and others are trying to make here is that LF has been as good if not better versus better opponents/athletes. And there really isn't any debate about that.
This post was edited on 8/27/16 at 3:35 pm
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 8/27/16 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

All of the measurables of Herschel and LF are similar. Saying that he is better based on your recollections and opinions of yore just doesn't make sense.
I already said their measurable were similar.

And better IS an opinion. By definition is an opinion. There are no stats ways to "prove" it.

You guys take shite as an insult when it isn't. Besides, I didn't say there's some wide gulf. I think it's VERY close.
quote:

Many of us have seen those games dozens of times over. The fact of the matter is you can put the films alongside each other (as has been done) and there is little or no objective difference in athletic ability. 

Two things. One, when putting them next to each other, there are no "facts". It's an opinion.

Second, you are correct. The difference, if any, is small.

You realize one can hold the OPINION that one of these guys is better than the other and not think the difference is substantial, right?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 8/27/16 at 3:46 pm to
quote:


The point that I and others are trying to make here is that LF has been as good if not better versus better opponents/athletes. And there really isn't any debate about that.

I agree. His stats and performance have been very comparable.

You guys are seeing conflict where one doesn't exist. One can think that Walker was the better back without saying any of what you said is wrong.

You can't trot out stats as a sole refutation.

If that's how it worked, then we'd have to all agree that Dan Marino was a better QB than Joe Montana.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram