- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DEA announces that marijuana will remain a Schedule 1 drug - like LSD & heroin
Posted on 8/11/16 at 11:06 am to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 8/11/16 at 11:06 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
What's strange is you can't smoke in bars here in Juneau, but you can partake of pot on premises in pot cafes. Times are a changing.
I'm not arguing legality. My argument is it is addictive. Studies prove it. Not as bad as other drugs, but to say it is not an addictive drug is complete bullshite.
4
Posted on 8/11/16 at 11:11 am to Taurus
quote:
I'm not arguing legality. My argument is it is addictive. Studies prove it. Not as bad as other drugs, but to say it is not an addictive drug is complete bull shite.
You were asked to back up your argument. Provide links to your studies rather than just saying google it.
and make sure it is physical addiction.
This post was edited on 8/11/16 at 11:14 am
Posted on 8/11/16 at 11:12 am to Taurus
quote:
My argument is it is addictive. Studies prove it. Not as bad as other drugs, but to say it is not an addictive drug is complete bullshite.
It kind of is complete bullshite though. Lots of things are addictive. Food can be addictive to some people. You're using a very wide brush to paint a really small picture.
At what point do you stop using the argument? More people are physically addicted to sugar and caffeine than pot. Why hang your entire argument on that one detail?
Posted on 8/11/16 at 11:14 am to Taurus
quote:
I'm not arguing legality. My argument is it is addictive. Studies prove it. Not as bad as other drugs, but to say it is not an addictive drug is complete bullshite.
People are "addicted" to caffeine, sex, eating, sugar, smart phones, Facebook, etc. Should all of these be schedule 1 narcotics as well?
Posted on 8/11/16 at 11:17 am to Taurus
I would think mildly addictive would be the classification. Withdrawal less displeasant than say, sugar addictions, like chocolate or soda.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News