- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/20/16 at 9:07 am to Placebeaux
quote:
The petitioners said that after providing Sasol with the documentation, they were further blackballed from the project, despite being promised that an executive “in charge of procurement” would get their trucks back into the trucking rotation. Sasol is accused of denying the companies work for about four weeks after being presented with the requested evidence.
So Sasol received the information and didn't just act. They probably have some red tape to go through. This is the only wrongdoing that the article says is done by Sasol.
ETA: I'm taking this as the turning a deaf ear section. 4 weeks to go through allegations and evidence for a billion dollar project. Doesn't seem unreasonable. Not saying what Kent did was right. You probably know more info than what is in the article.
This post was edited on 7/20/16 at 9:12 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News