Started By
Message

re: TDBBL - SOTU - Referendum #1: League Structure Vote

Posted on 7/21/16 at 7:45 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423382 posts
Posted on 7/21/16 at 7:45 am to
quote:

I'm wondering if this doesn't even need to be capped. If owner wants to pay inflation on bunch of players, more power to them.

Has to be annual salary increase, $5-7.

i don't get why it needs a cap or "contracts" because the increase will work itself out. if the cap is $250, then make the cap hit/increase like $15/year. that will work itself out

quote:

This will force salaries to match-up in trades.

this is going to be important if you don't want "selling out" to start up again

don't get too complex just because it sounds interesting or b/c there is an option for it. there's no need
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 7/21/16 at 7:48 am to
quote:

don't get too complex just because it sounds interesting or b/c there is an option for it. there's no need




Agreed
Posted by Toula
504
Member since Dec 2006
35399 posts
Posted on 7/21/16 at 7:57 am to
Yea. Simple version is you can keep whoever you want year to year, and their keeper value increases by X.

And we would just stay with ESPN.
This post was edited on 7/21/16 at 7:58 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram