- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Has Rotten Tomatoes jumped the shark?...
Posted on 7/16/16 at 8:52 pm to Addison Tiger
Posted on 7/16/16 at 8:52 pm to Addison Tiger
quote:
In looking at some of the reviews, they marked reviews 'fresh' that I would not. Would you want to see a movie that is described like this...
quote:
How will the reboot be remembered a couple of decades down the line? Not as beloved, or beloathed; more likely as beliked, if it's remembered at all.
Yet they marked that as a 'fresh' review. In fact, the average critic score is only 6.5/10.
This has probably already been posted, but if not... Rotten tomatoes doesn't "Mark" each review, the critic does that. It's based on simply "good" or "bad". So if a critic gives it a 6/10, that's separate from his "good" vote. The percentage they use is the percentage of "good" reveiws by the critics. So a 6/10 movie could still be "certified fresh"
This post was edited on 7/16/16 at 8:59 pm
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News