- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ok, possibly dumb question regarding absolute vs lower 1/3 co-witness
Posted on 7/15/16 at 11:47 am to DarthTiger
Posted on 7/15/16 at 11:47 am to DarthTiger
It's not a dumb question, because it is confusing. If you recall that the terms are differentiating between 2 things, neither of which involve actual "zero" - despite any misconceptions.
The first is mounting of the optic compared to the BUIS.
The second is the sight picture when using the optic.
For any sight to be zeroed, that sight has to deliver a bullet to a mark (assuming correct sight picture, alignment and other fundamentals) at a predefined distance. There is no "Kentucky windage" or anything like that at the zeroed distance. Zero is zero.
Hope this helps.
The first is mounting of the optic compared to the BUIS.
The second is the sight picture when using the optic.
For any sight to be zeroed, that sight has to deliver a bullet to a mark (assuming correct sight picture, alignment and other fundamentals) at a predefined distance. There is no "Kentucky windage" or anything like that at the zeroed distance. Zero is zero.
Hope this helps.
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News