Started By
Message

re: Alonzo Gee declined his player option

Posted on 6/29/16 at 10:00 pm to
Posted by BallHawk
Orlando
Member since Jul 2011
5741 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 10:00 pm to
I'm no insider, but I have my doubts that Reke is brought back. I feel the same about Babbitt but less so. Gentry seemed to like his shooting ability and he'd be a cheap vet bench piece which is needed for depth.

Diallo, hopefully, won't see the court much is first year. He needs time to develop.
This post was edited on 6/29/16 at 10:01 pm
Posted by 504ByrdGang
Member since Nov 2013
2495 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 10:09 pm to
Think of Dell's track record when has he ever gave a player away unless he had replacement level talent.
Posted by THRILLHO
Metry, LA
Member since Apr 2006
49519 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

I'm no insider, but I have my doubts that Reke is brought back


He's under contract. If he's not healthy, we may not have a choice.


And as much as everyone not named 504Byrd would hate to admit it, Reke would not only most likely be our best bench player, but he'd be a top 5-10 6th man in the league if healthy. Especially if he can maintain/come close to his 39% 3pt shooting last season. He doesn't fit what Gentry wants to do at all, but he has talent. Dumping him for depth makes sense, but if you don't spend that extra $11m wisely, it doesn't necessarily make us better.
This post was edited on 6/29/16 at 10:14 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram