- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pointless theoretical estimation question re: ants
Posted on 6/17/16 at 6:25 pm to Purple Spoon
Posted on 6/17/16 at 6:25 pm to Purple Spoon
quote:
times 20 billion years
You lost me.
The Earth is only 4.6 billion years old. Plus, scientists estimate that ants are only about 92 million years-old.
2
Posted on 6/17/16 at 6:28 pm to saint amant steve
You'd have to know how long they have been as dominant as they are today. How widespread were they? Did ice ages severely reduce their numbers multiple times?
One wonders
One wonders
Posted on 6/17/16 at 7:20 pm to saint amant steve
Dinosours were alive 200 million plus years ago. I would think ants have been around a he'll of a lot longer than dinos. You are correct about the age of earth though.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News