re: Phil Jackson: "LeBron needs to takeover like Michael did"

quote:

---

And a whole lot of other stuff as well

---

I'm really not sure what they are arguing now. MJ > LeBron because he was better than LeBron. There are a number of variables that contributes to the quality of a player, but at the end of the day, it doesn't matter what the exact combination is if determining the quality.

It's just one big regression equation. BUT there is a reason we have predictive/explanatory variables and an OUTCOME variable. We are trying to figure out the OUTCOME because it is what we value.

BUT WE HAVE THE OUTCOME,